Author Topic: IQ Test  (Read 3492 times)

Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2005, 05:26:13 pm »

This method for testing a person's IQ is seriously flawed and becoming outdated. I recently attended a conference on types of IQ chaired by a number of specialists and they concluded that there are at least eight different types of intelligence.


Added to that it is not your IQ that counts - but what you do with it.

Old but spicey!

Offline goldencup

  • Addict (purple)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10594
  • Karma: 105
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2005, 06:57:45 pm »
I quite agree with you Oldspice and in any case this must have been a fluke as I know perfectly well my IQ is only around 130.  It's far too short a test to give an accurate result but I found it fun to do anyway.  I went on a course recently that tested different learning styles and that was interesting.
Cantankerous Old Crone

Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2005, 10:47:56 pm »

Yes, in my job we take learning styles very seriously. Delivering the subject using a method that incorporates a variety of learning styles is very important. If someone is a kinesthetic learner (hands on) it's no good trying to teach them using only talk and chalk methods.


Likewise, there are various types of dyslexia. Some people with dyslexia have an auditory disfunction and cannot remember word sounds. Therefore, they learn to read and spell best if you use visual stimuli. For dyslexics with visual perceptual difficulties, you use audio stimuli to help them develop reading and spelling skills. 


People can seem unintelligent if they have not learned to tap into their preferred learning style.

Old but spicey!

Offline loulou

  • Global Moderator
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • Karma: 104
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2005, 12:19:38 am »

Quote from: bounty hunter
That's seriously low.  I mean learning difficulty low.


You haven't even done it yet so who says your score will be more than 99.

A power-crazy bitch who lives in a fantasy world

  • Guest
IQ Test
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2005, 08:22:57 am »

I have done it and got 146. 


I have to say that it is not a proper IQ test as the true or false answers leave too much to an element of chance. 


Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2005, 08:48:53 am »

There is no such thing as a proper IQ test. Who decideds? I know plenty of people with so-called high IQs who are complete fools.


The couldn't organise their way out of a paper bag.

Old but spicey!

Offline goldencup

  • Addict (purple)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10594
  • Karma: 105
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #21 on: June 27, 2005, 08:53:03 am »
Oldspice, we have to incorporate all the learning styles too when arranging children's holiday activities and I found the course fascinating.  Mine came out as a combination of musical, kinesthetic and interpersonal styles which I have to agree with.  I have trouble putting faces to names rather than the other way round.  But give me a dance or exercise routine to learn and the moment I hear the music again I'll remember it perfectly! 
Cantankerous Old Crone

Offline smurfboy

  • Global Moderator
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 16836
  • Karma: 105
    • View Profile
IQ Test
« Reply #22 on: June 27, 2005, 11:43:16 am »
I haven't done this test - I got 147 on one I did a while back which is apparently near genius level, so I'm sticking with my high score thanks very much!
Who needs karma when you know you're great already?