Author Topic: Royal Baby  (Read 3005 times)

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Royal Baby
« on: July 22, 2013, 07:24:32 pm »
Name predictions! I'm going with Diana for a girl and Clive for a boy.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline Rainbow

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
  • Karma: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2013, 09:17:07 pm »
Why Clive wjp666?

I would think Diana for a girl would be a bit of a smack in the eye for Camilla, but a good choice as far as Harry is concerned.

I am thinking that traditionally speaking Victoria would be an excellent choice for a girl and possibly Philip or George for a boy. I mean what on earth are we going to do with a Queen Debbie or a King Keanu?

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2013, 10:49:02 pm »
Well, now we know it's a boy.

Either Clive or Greg, with a possibility of Bruce.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline GimmeTheSoddingChoc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 352
  • Karma: -63
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2013, 10:48:15 am »
Can I not go anywhere to get away from this? So, a baby I shall never know personally was delivered to parents I have never met in my life. Whoopy, doo! Do you get the sense that I'm not a Royalist?

They could call it Cyril or Tarquin for all I care...

Offline goldencup

  • Addict (purple)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10594
  • Karma: 105
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2013, 01:12:45 pm »
I'm going with Kayden
Cantankerous Old Crone

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2013, 02:16:59 pm »
How about King Kenzie?
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline Rainbow

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
  • Karma: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2013, 08:14:37 pm »
Ooooh, I was right.
Prince George.

I think it's lovely.
I am not a royalist, I am a 'happy parents with a new baby'-ist.  ;D

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2013, 11:27:07 pm »
I'm not a royalist either (just fail to see what they even do in 2013) but baybees are cuuuuuute!
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline GimmeTheSoddingChoc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 352
  • Karma: -63
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2013, 11:46:14 am »
Babies are evil. Get more then three of them in a room and the result is scary. More babies = more evil!!!!

The Royal Baby is the Antichrist. FACT!

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2013, 07:25:45 pm »
Nah... MY kid is the antichrist. Trust me... I live with eeeeeeeevil 24/7.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #10 on: July 27, 2013, 10:39:56 am »
I'm going with Kayden

At work, I suggested Jayden Shane for the royal baby and that went down well.  I suppose we're going to get endless photos and updates every time he burps. Still, at least the media is giving Pippa's bum a rest.
Old but spicey!

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Baby
« Reply #11 on: July 27, 2013, 11:45:08 pm »
I was really hoping they'd do something a little original with the name, but alas, pressure from granny won them over I bet.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.