In many ways I was hoping we could avoid this topic, but seeing as it's here now I'll add my thoughts.
Paulham's point about the media is interesting, as it appears to me in this case, the papers are declaring the McCanns innocent without trial - which is a very different thing from innocent until proven guilty. The 'party line' seems to be that we should all be horrified the Portuguese police are even considering the McCanns as suspects, let alone questioning them. But what happens if it is proven they did kill the child? The same papers will be ranting and raving about what a disgrace it is that it took so long for the parents to be named as suspects! I only know what I have read in terms of evidence, but while this could have been exaggerated or misrepresented, I do not believe it has been entirely fabricated, so the police are doing 100% the right thing in following it up.
All along in this case I have felt somewhat uncomfortable about how the McCanns have 'played' the media to suit their needs. The fact that they left small children alone in a hotel room/apartment in a foreign country barely gets a mention, as if it's a mistake anyone could make. Yes, in an ideal world you should never have to think 'what if someone takes my child away?' because in an ideal world it wouldn't happen. But it does, so we do have to think like that. As Naxos said, would parents on a council estate get the same sympathy as two doctors are getting?
So guilty or not guilty? Thankfully that's not for me to decide. But I won't apologise to anyone for considering the question - and neither should the Portugeuse police.
As a side note to this, it was reported in yesterday's Metro that a man had been convicted of murdering his daughter. It got a small paragraph on page 16.