Sorry to be boring but......back to topic.
From what I can gather from these posts, she took the job knowing she had to wear it under her clothes, and if she was wearing it, she must have worn it under her clothes for a while or they wouldn't have given her the job in the first place right?
So my thought goes ...........If she knew she wasn't allowed to wear it out of her clothes, and wore it next to her skin for the interview in order to get the job, which she must have done....... what's her problem now?
Either she has only just started wearing it and therefore how religious can it be for her? OR she wasn't bothered enough to state her case from the start and insist on wearing it outside her clothes at which point they would have hired someone else. It would seem to be more about sueing them for money than anything else.
I can't see any of the options I can come up with showing her in a very good light at all.
Velvet.