Author Topic: Tattoos on women (Read 3266 times)

smurfboy · « **on:** March 25, 2006, 12:35:42 am »

Attractive or vulgar? Discuss.

loulou · « **Reply #1 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:38:26 am »

Well I like to see girls with tattoos at the bottom of their backs. I think that's nice. The girl who used to do my hair had a lovely tattoo of sunflowers around her waist with a little chain tattood at the front.

Tattoos on arms, legs ,ankles, I find vulgar. I have seen a few women with tattoos on their breast and they look like cheap common tarts.

smurfboy · « **Reply #2 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:40:34 am »

Tattoos on the tops of arms are the worst. SOOOO common. The worst is a rose

loulou · « **Reply #3 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:41:12 am »

Roses and dolphins are the most common tattoos.

smurfboy · « **Reply #4 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:43:24 am »

'Common' being the operative word!

wjp666 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:49:22 am »

it annoys me when they have their kids names tattooed on themselves. not sure why - it's just tacky.

loulou · « **Reply #6 on:** March 25, 2006, 12:58:42 am »

For people with bad memories or loads of kids perhaps?

smurfboy · « **Reply #7 on:** March 25, 2006, 01:06:42 am »

And have you noticed it's always a silly name?

« **Reply #8 on:** March 25, 2006, 07:44:07 am »

I don't like to see tattoos on women. Tattoos are for sailors, soldiers and criminals. I have never understood why people want to have them. I once saw an oik with one on his forehead. He had written CFCN and the letters were backwards. He had obviously done it himself and presumably intended to do NCFC (Notts County Football club) and had done it in a mirror. I kid you not.

oldspice · « **Reply #9 on:** March 25, 2006, 08:21:00 am »

What about those people that have L O V E on the knuckles of one wrist and H A T E on the knuckles of the other? Don't you just want to poke their eyes out???

« **Reply #10 on:** March 25, 2006, 08:27:20 am »

No, I think they're just sad.

oldspice · « **Reply #11 on:** March 25, 2006, 08:37:31 am »

I was speaking metophorically.

« **Reply #12 on:** March 25, 2006, 08:50:13 am »

Ah, OK.

StrollingMinstrel · « **Reply #13 on:** March 25, 2006, 09:54:57 am »

I'm not a fan of tattoos at all. Don't people realize that the skin loses it's elasticity with age? When I see tattoos on a young woman, or man, I just can't help imagining what it might look like at .... say 70ish?

There are so many temporary tattoos on the market now that I can't understand why anyone would opt for a perminant one.

That said, I guess it is a free world and if people want to use their body as a canvas and are up for the pain it's their call.

goldencup · « **Reply #14 on:** March 25, 2006, 02:06:40 pm »

I'm with Loulou - I think some of the discreet ones on a nice slim woman look ok and the lower back has to be the best place to have one as the skin isn't so likely to get stretched there. I've seen some interesting post-pregnancy ones that people have regretted.

News:

Author Topic: Tattoos on women (Read 3266 times)