Author Topic: Shoudl charles Be king? (Read 4873 times)

Forth Bridges · « **on:** November 09, 2005, 10:50:45 pm »

shoudl this jug ear idoit be king NO he will never be come until teh Queen Dies ( thank god) even then it shoudl go to william !

« **Reply #1 on:** November 09, 2005, 10:54:08 pm »

I would skip the monarchy altogether and make Kirsty Wark President

viking · « **Reply #2 on:** November 09, 2005, 10:57:30 pm »

sod the royals.............parasites

loulou · « **Reply #3 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:10:16 pm »

I've said it before. We should have bombed the lot of them at the last wedding.

Forth Bridges · « **Reply #4 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:16:25 pm »

who edwards casue that was the last tiem the whole lot of them were together No wehn charles get weed Teh queen wasn't even thier!

viking · « **Reply #5 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:17:39 pm »

here here

loulou · « **Reply #6 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:28:30 pm »

Edward is really gay and his marriage is a sham.

viking · « **Reply #7 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:30:54 pm »

do you think his ears pick up sky?

loulou · « **Reply #8 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:33:37 pm »

Charles's do.

« **Reply #9 on:** November 09, 2005, 11:55:08 pm »

Edward's gay? I have wondered that.

loulou · « **Reply #10 on:** November 10, 2005, 12:03:39 am »

So is Philip

oldspice · « **Reply #11 on:** November 10, 2005, 06:56:30 am »

I feel sorry for the Royals. They have been turned into a big tourist/celebrity joke. They've got no dignity and the public give them no repect because the public think that because they're paying them, they own them. Just look at the reaction after Diana's death - the Royals could not even greive in the way they wanted to.

I say, let them all retire NOW and live off their considerate private incomes. That's that.

lemoneye · « **Reply #12 on:** November 10, 2005, 08:31:59 am »

Private incomes - no, they can receive the UK average wage and they can struggle on it like the rest of us. In countries where the monarch retains power, then it is fine. PLUS Harry Hewitt is clearly NOT Charles son...

smurfboy · « **Reply #13 on:** November 10, 2005, 12:54:15 pm »

Quote from: lemoneye

Private incomes - no, they can receive the UK average wage and they can struggle on it like the rest of us. In countries where the monarch retains power, then it is fine. PLUS Harry Hewitt is clearly NOT Charles son...

He might be a public figure, but does he really deserve to have his paternity speculated over in public? And why do all the people who say he looks like Hewitt forget he's also the spit of Charles Spencer?

lemoneye · « **Reply #14 on:** November 10, 2005, 01:59:41 pm »

When your mother - in this case diana - has SO many illicit affairs - it is a natural reaction for people to question paternity. If for example smurfy you found yourself subject of a paternity claim from the local bike you would say "hey but who HASN'T she done?" And you would be in your rights to do so. Of course there may well be likenesses of BOTH families in ALL children. Just seems, considering the timing and unfortunate appearance, that Harry MAY be of of differing parentage to his brother...

News:

Author Topic: Shoudl charles Be king? (Read 4873 times)