Author Topic: The Oscars  (Read 1740 times)

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
The Oscars
« on: February 23, 2009, 05:14:53 pm »
so, was i the only sap up late last night watching?

did 'Slumdog' really deserve all that attention?

would mr. ledger have really won best supporting actor if he was still with us?

i for one was sad to see mickey rourke get robbed of best actor by sean penn.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2009, 05:23:17 pm »
I've seen Slumdog and The Wrestler. I think Slumdog definitely deserved the awards it got. As for The Wrestler, well, I couldn't see how Mickey Rourke got nominated as I think he was wooden and mumbling and the film was very boring, in my opinion. There were some aspects of it that struck me - for example how a man can impose utter carnage on another man's body on the canvas and yet behave like a gentleman to his partner before and after the match - even to the extent of calling the other one 'sir'. The stapler machine act was freaky.
Old but spicey!

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2009, 05:28:30 pm »
i'm off to see 'Slumdog' later this week and get to the bottom of all this hype.

as for 'The Wrestler' - i thought it was a great film, and i really thought mickey's role was just amazing. (i've found him wooden in just about every movie he's ever done, but not this one.) i personally thought it moved at a swift pace and didn't lag at all. (well, maybe i'm being a tad prejudiced here because it's subject matter is something i'm really into.)
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline oldspice

  • Addict (blue)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 10623
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2009, 07:32:49 pm »
I'm probably being unfair as it's not the sort of film I would usually watch - although years ago I really enjoyed The Champ.
Old but spicey!

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2009, 07:34:27 pm »
'The Champ' - classic stuff (in its own way.)
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline LSwaha11

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: 1
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2009, 03:38:56 pm »
The Wrestler was a fantastic movie, and it is ashame the film got shut out from any awards.
Nothing compares to the sweet taste of chocolate!

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2009, 04:13:14 pm »
indeed! well said.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Offline chocadmin

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Karma: 66
    • View Profile
    • Chocolate Review
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2009, 06:22:39 pm »
I haven't seen the wrestler or slumdog (yet :) ) but from all accounts it does seem very unfair that mickey rourke missed out - it seems unlikely that he'll ever have another role so ideal for him.

Offline wjp666

  • Addict (green)
  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7042
  • Karma: 113
    • View Profile
Re: The Oscars
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2009, 06:53:24 pm »
that's the way i see it. sean penn is bound to have another chance down the road somewhere.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.