Most People Online. EVER!

[loulou]

By law doesn't a person developing photos have to report something they deem to be improper.

[netbuddy]

Yep, 100% correct.

You do get your regulars who STILL try to get material processed by using several different shops and different names.

I suppose now everything is going digital and being able to print your own at home... these sorts of things will not be intercepted.

As for disturbing enlargements, we would regularly get in a few naturalists on various holiday and resort shots.

I used to laugh at the students that worked in the engineering dept. As they had to constantly tend to the machinery, when ever a set of nudes came out of the processor, you'd often hear a loud cheer & woolf whistles, if it was male nudes, you'd here a loud boo-ing. Nutters the lot of them.

[netbuddy]

By law doesn't a person developing photos have to report something they deem to be improper.

Basic rules are you can have a male and a female, male and a male, female and female or any combo mix you like as long as theirs no clear signs of penetration going on, if that is the case then its an actual offence as it is considered hard porn and currently in the UK hard porn is banned where as soft porn (top shelf stuff) is legal. The line that divides the two is very very thin.

ANY photo thats got nudity in it that also contains children has to be assessed by the lab supervisors, if they do not feel that the pictures warrant a call to the police, they will first off run a copy set off which is then locked in a safe and the shop (originator) and the customer (clients name) get logged in a book.

If they keep getting dodgy photos they report you and give the police all the materials gathered to that date. If they do not get a repeat, think its 3 months, the prints are then destroyed.

[loulou]

I imagine more people use a digital camera and print their pics of themselves.

[netbuddy]

Well for every technology or advancement you always have the Pro's & Con's that come part n parcel of it all.