Chocolate Forum
Chat => General => Topic started by: netbuddy on December 12, 2008, 11:59:07 am
-
Echers Angels & Devils.
When I first viewed this the work was presented in its normal orientation, then I found (attachment) piece but it was presented upside down to when I saw the item on TV.
The thing I noticed is that this piece relies on the way it is presented, if you present it upside down, I notice the white angels first and if in the pictures original orientation, I see the Black Devils first.
How about you?
[attachment expired by admin]
-
Oh dear. I straight away saw bats actually. Cant see angels in either. Is that good or bad?
Scampy
-
That's my point, depending on how the image is presented to you will depend on how your eye and brain sees the image.
When I first saw it, I saw a black devil as the image was shown in its original intended orientation, the second time I saw it, a few days later was by accident but viewed from upside down and the first item I saw was the white angel and trying subsequent experiments, I notice that the orientation or the way this image is presented plays a large part in how the viewer responds.
-
I saw the devils, then I saw the angels! Surreal!
-
If I hadn't seen the thread title I'd have thought they were bats.
-
I can just see schoolgirls. Am I looking at it the wrong way round?
-
Just from your own unique angle ;)
-
Bats and angels for me.
What has this got to do with lard anyway?
-
Is that that a Scottish way of saying, 'What this got to do with the price of fish?'
-
Look at netbuddy's signature, bounty.
-
I just see bats.
-
Have you clicked on the pic to enlarge it Lou?
-
OMG enlarging it made me see a huge snowman with horns. Flaming freaky.
-
That sounds kinda kinky! ;)
-
Is that a ice pole (popsicle for our American friends) or are you just pleased to see me, Frosty?
(http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/mikeymac00/FrostytheSnowman.png)
-
I wonder who that was modelled on.