A grandmother has been fined 80 - for dropping two Quavers on the pavement.
Officials later apologised for issuing the on-the-spot fine, blaming it on "overzealous" council wardens.
I don't think anyone should apologise except for the woman and she should pay the fine.loulou2007-05-20 13:35:55
Quite right - I think a short term of imprisonment would have been more appropriate.
This is a difficult one. I would drop an apple core on the grass verge for birds to eat because i think it is wasteful to throw it in the bin. I would never throw a crisp packet on the grass verge. However, how is a litter warden to know that i am not a habitual litter thrower?
The answer is obvious. Distinguish between litter and disgarded biodegradable material. Obviously, take into consideration where the matter is deposited - for example throwing it on the pavement or road might cause a slipping hazard.
But we should clamp down hard on people who throw litter on the pavements and roads - and that includes cigarette ends.
I hate seeing people throw litter out of car windows, and chewing gum on the pavements is awful too.
But little old ladies with quavers I'm not sure about.
I agree that littering is bad, and I agree that you shouldn't let her off and even apologise to her just because she's old, but I have dropped crisps and not picked them up as dogs and birds eat them, and I throw crusts and apple cores for birds and such too. But I don't really think of that as littering, more a form of re-cycling. But if I drop anything else I pick it up and put it in the bin.
Maybe if littering could be re-defined and made more place and danger/mess specific, life might be a bit easier?
Also will this smoking ban in public places will mean a lot fewer cigarette ends in the street, or will it make it worse as all those people who can't smoke inside anymore all stand outside smoking instead?